I'm quite a fan of Google, and I have just had yet another unit of joy from them:

Earlier this year Google put together a new mobile version of their search site called Google LCB.  The L in LCB seems to be Location, but there isn't much of substance around the web on what the acronym really means.  Who cares!  It's the concept that matters.

So why is it good?

As can be seen in some of the screen shots around the web, users get to save a couple of locations in a list, and then drill through various categories of content to find what they want, including a distance estimate.  The key thing is you do this without typing on your keypad!  This makes it very quick to navigate.

I've made it my new home page on my N73!

Other Google services I can't live without on my phone are:

• Google Maps - the S60 app version, although the Maps Mobile Web Site is quite good at a pinch
• The Google Apps for Domains Mail / GMail Mobile Web Site is very good, however the S60 App version only works for GMail not Google Apps for Domains Mail

This is made all the more exciting with the news that the first ever phone using Google Linux-based phone OS - "Android" is about to hit the market.

Now all we need is mobile data plans that are a tad more reasonable on the hip pocket!

Is it just me?   Or does the new Yahoo!7 search bar look like a cigarette?



Not convinced?  The search bar at My Yahoo!7 is even less subtle:



Don't worry, I'm not one of those smokers who tries to quit and then sees cigarettes everywhere... I'm not even a smoker.  It just struck me as an odd choice for a visual motif.

...and it's not even the oh-so-cool, Breakfast at Tiffany's kind of cigarette.  Google would be the Audrey Hepburn of search cigarettes.  Yahoo7 are more the Danny Crane of search.

Today at REMiX '08 Sydney (Also see VisitMIX) along with a good show and a grand feed, attendees also got a copy of Expression Studio 2.  After seeing it in action I'm quite looking forward to taking it around the block.  I never quite got into [Macromedia|Adobe]Flash, and am quietly hoping Silverlight can find a spot next to it in the web ecosystem.

First thing I did when I got home was install Expression Studio, I got a little curious to find that there is a Visual Studio 2008 Standard disk in the box.  It got me to wonder what really is the difference between VS Pro which I am using at the moment and VS Standard?

I can't remember the product comparison pages for any version of Visual Studio on MSDN ever being completely illuminating.  The 2008 version is about as good as it gets it seems. 

The one that I am most interested in somehow is down the end of the list:  the inclusion of the Unit Testing features in VSPro 2008, when it was only included in Team System versions of VS 2005.  Here is a slightly abridged summary of the other features included in VS Professional that you do not get in VS Standard:

Debugging Tools:

• Attach to Remote Process
• SQL-CLR Debugging
• XSLT Debugger
• T-SQL Debugging

Data Tools:

• Database Projects
• SQL Server Projects
• Server Explorer

Reporting:

• Crystal Reports Application & Crystal Reports for Visual Studio

Office development:

• VSTO for Office 2003 and Office 2007
• Sharepoint 2007 State Machine workflow template
  

Smart Device Development:

• Device Emulator
• Project Templates
• Debugging Tools

...but surely this can't be it?

It's not.  Well, this is the story if you are comparing VS Pro and VS Standard alone, but there is one other thing to consider:

1. In my timezone, the full boxed retail VS Standard is less than half the price of the equiv. VS Professional... but;
   
2. You can't get an MSDN Subscription including VS Standard.  They are only available with Professional and above, and imho the licensing benefits of MSDN for developers is well worth the look.
   

So there you have it.  If an MSDN Subscription is on your radar, enjoy using VS Pro.  If it is not, and you can live without the above listed features, well maybe there is no need to spend more than you have to.

I recieved the following question yesterday, and I have had it before, so I decided to blog the answer.

Hiya James

I am not sure if you would be willing to help answer a question on sharepoint?

Sounds really stupid but just using MOSS and I have not had to deal with any SQL database ... so where

can I actually view it or find it?

Thank you

Ray


First up, it's far from a stupid question!  especially is Windows Internal Database (a.k.a SQLEE is used).  Let me explain:

So, there are a couple of choices for setting up the database:

1. Windows Internal Database

It is really easy to set the system up with this option, and frankly, I don't like it for my systems.  The reason I don't like it is because it splits my DR plan.  

For every other application I have a nice unified backup & recovery strategy in SQL Server Management Studio.  Using WIDB for Sharepoint introduces exceptions to the rule, and from my experience, the systems with the most moving parts are the ones that are most likely to fail under pressure, and DR can have pressure!  Of course YMMV.

What is Windows Internal Database?  It is an instance of SQL Server Express configured to be accessed only by services over named pipes, although it is possible to connect to it with SQLCMD or Management Studio Express.  It works just as well as SQL Express, but I feel like I am never fully in control of it.

If you are using SQLEE for your Sharepoint installation and you want to have a look at the database, I'd suggest the following:

1. Backup your Sharepoint instance using Central Administration
2. Setup a test instance of Sharepoint using SQL Express
3. Restore your Sharepoint backup into your new test instance
4. Use Management Studio to work on your new test database
   

2. Using "real" SQL Server. 

This is a much easier case.  Log into the Sharepoint Central Admin section and view the content database settings.  That will give you the server & database names that you can connect to with Management Studio.  (please work on a copy, not the production database)

...but...

...is it wise to get hands-on with the MOSS/WSS database?

Well yes, for general curiosity to see how the Sharepoint team decided to implement a system where entities can be so customizable, there is some good, subtle design to learn from.

However for reporting and other fiddling, I'd suggest not.  Once you see the tables I think you will agree that it was not a design goal for the developer community to be accessing them directly.

A good alternative would be learning some CAML or the Object Model first and see if you can leverage that.  Those ways to access the data abstract out the complexity of the physical database and are quite user friendly.

How to setup Sharepoint to use SQL Express rather than SQLEE/WIDB?

It is easy and free to set up a testing environment for Sharepoint:

All you need to do is download the following:

• Windows Server 2008 Standard Trial
• Virtual PC
• WSS 3.0 (incl SP1)
• WSS SDK
• SQL Server Express Edition
  

How to setup Sharepoint to use SQL Express rather than SQLEE/WIDB - Part II, The Install...

When installing Sharepoint, choosing Basic/Stand Alone will leave you with a WIDB install of Sharepoint.  To install a it with a "regular" SQL Server, or with SQL Express, first choose Advanced from the installation wizard:

When asked if you want to create a Web Front End server, or a Stand-alone install, choose Web Front End - even if it is your only server:



Continue the install and launch the Sharepoint Product and Technologies configuration wizard.   Choose to create a new server farm.  Enter the database server and database name settings into the wizard when prompted...




Now you have configured Sharepoint to not use WIDB/SQLEE.

If you have already installed SQLEE and now wish to remove it, please see my prior post on uninstalling SQLEE.

I offer the following evidence:

For those not familiar with the idea of a Googlewhack, Urban Dictionary explains it is:

a combination of two words that when searched through the popular search engine "google" only give one result.

Wikipedia goes into more depth, yet is silent on the topic of spelling.

I argue that stsadmin, or it's correct form, stsadm are not words, so can't be typos - and as such I'm claiming it! 

This is just a quick note with some linkage for anyone who is looking for an easy way to make Sharepoint look less like Sharepoint

Some sample master pages have been released and are available for download.   They are good examples for basing new master pages on, but also look good too!   For screen shots see the post on the Sharepoint Product Group blog.

I'm using the "Clarity" one now and like it

Also, check out the Templates available at the MOSS site.

Listening to:  ANZAC Day pipes and drums

This is the first in what I hope will become a series on the new language features in C# 3.0 used in .NET 3.5 / Visual Studio 2008.

One thing I am not intending to cover is LINQ.  Just because the blogosphere has been buzzing with LINQ articles since the early days of "Orcas".  And with good reason I hasten to add!

Where I am starting is with the var keyword.

VB6 veterans will remember the Variant type.  A Variant could contain anything, even Object.  While this was sort of useful, my memory of it is as a synonym for:  I can't be bothered, lets just stick it in a Variant and deal with it later.

There was also a performance impact of using the special Variant type, they were large in memory and have an overhead of extra runtime checking that added up; like when assigned inside a loop for example.  They were also a special case in their un-assigned form, taking on the value Empty (test with IsEmpty()) vs Nothing (test with Is Nothing). 

So when I saw var added to C# I raised my eyebrows in the way a Fed might, when the beagle sits quietly next to your suitcase at the airport.

Most of the time you see it in the samples, it is used when returning an Anonymous Type from a LINQ query.  And this is the clue!  var is not itself a type, but instead it is a signal to the compiler to infer the type of an operation, and substitute in the required type.  It does not even have to be an Anonymous Type.  Consider the following simple example:

var result = 10 / 2.0;
Console.WriteLine(result.ToString());

By the time this code is compiled, var is replaced with double.  In fact, the Intellisense on result will be correct for it being a double.

To confirm this, looking at those lines of the assembly in Lutz Roder's Reflector show the following after disassembly:

double result = 5.0;
Console.WriteLine(result.ToString());

OK, so var can be used independant of Anonymous Types, but why would you want to be less explicit in typing your variables?  Consider the following fictitious example:

DatabaseRequestService req = DatabaseRequestService.CreateFrom(value);

And compare it with the equivalent line using var:

var req = DatabaseRequestService.CreateFrom(value);

Here, var leads itself to much more readable syntax with the same typing, Intellisense, and everything else!

Listening To:  Róisín Murphy

I just wanted to add a note before my next posting to acknowledge that I know this blog has been slow of late.

This isn't because I am bored of it or anything, but it does relate to my own personal rules for blogging, and this might be a reasonable time to mention them

Rule Zero:  Keep it interesting.  Believe it or not, I try and keep this blog interesting.

Rule One: Don’t blog about blogging.  The blogosphere can be one huge echo chamber at times.  If you must inform the world that someone else made a great blog post, consider Twitter.

NB: When I do post linkage I put it in the MLP category, which owes its name to the MLP (a.k.a Mindless Link Propagation) section on the internet culture stalwart Kuro5hin (i.e.  “corrosion”)

Rule Two:  No proprietary information.  This is what I’m talking about today.

Recently, I started a company, and have been working on some IP in the multitenant and SharePoint space.  These are really interesting to me, but there has been a bitlot of business strategy & architecture stuff, and that has to stay internal.

Hope this makes sense, and I really welcome comments on this topic if anyone feels like they have something to share.

Listening To: Ani DiFranco, Canon