Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Lots of people are familiar with obtaining and installing SSL Certificates for hosting secure web sites, but the area of code signing seems less cohesive. I’ve compiled some notes I have on the process together in this blog post.

Yes, but who are you?

Reputable publishers of code signing certificates require some evidence that you are authorized with respect to the organization you wish to have named on your certificate. In my case, being able to produce the ASIC registration for my company was enough, YMMV.

This is subtle, but important.

  1. My company rego papers are credentials a Root CA (e.g Comodo, Verisign, Thawte, USERTrust etc) uses to trusts me.
  2. The user (implicitly) trust the Root CA by using an OS with their Certificate installed.
  3. Ergo, the user (indirectly) trusts me.

Macro projects in Microsoft Excel/Word/Visio/Access/etc

Once you have obtained your certificate, you are able to sign Macro projects in Office document templates by choosing Tools -> Digital Signature.

Your newly purchased certificate will appear in the list and by saving the project your template is signed. The difference is now the user is asked to trust you (as verified by the CA) and your code, rather than being asked to enable all macros.

Software distributed MSI packages

Signing MSI packages and CAB files is more visible than ever before in Windows Vista. This I think is a good thing, however I do worry that because there are a lot of unsigned installers out there that users may get the message that it’s not that important.

Once you have got your certificate from a CA, the process couldn’t be easier. There are a couple of ways to get signtool.exe, I usually have the Windows SDK on my machines which ships with it.  The command to sign ClassLibrary1.dll for example is: (assuming signing from a pfx, not the local cert store)

C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\bin\signtool.exe sign /f My_Code_Signing_Cert.pfx /p L0ng5ecr3tp@ssw0rd /d name /du http://www.MyCompany.com /t http://timestamp.verisign.com/scripts/timestamp.dll ClassLibrary1.dll

The time stamping is important here, in that certificates expire. An external time stamp ensures that the assembly was signed while the certificate was valid.

.NET Assemblies

Technically, signing an assembly is not unlike signing an MSI. On one hand it is easier because you can do the signing from inside Visual Studio’s project properties

On the hand there is the concept of delay signing, where the actual private key is not available to the developer on a day-to-day basis.  This added security adds a layer of complexity that is frankly beyond the scope of this post. I will come back and dedicate a whole post to it some time :-)

Windows Logo Certification / WinQual

This is the only case I can think of where the vendor of the certificate matters. A certificate from VeriSign is required to prove your identity in the WinQual program, which is required for a Windows Logo certification. VeriSign has special pricing is on offer for members of Windows Quality Online Services site.  The $99 cert from VeriSign is required for WinQual membership, and is all you need if you already have a code signing certificate. The $399 cert is valid for both code signing and WinQual membership.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:26:10 PM (AUS Eastern Standard Time, UTC+10:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Monday, January 14, 2008
So looking forward to another year in Visual Studio, and this year in Visual Studio 2008 no less! 

I thought I'd open 2008's blog posts with a note about what is in my toolkit at the moment for developing in VS2008.  So in no particular order...

What is in?

  • Visual Studio 2008.  I played with it since Beta1, and blogged about it a bit too.  Living in the RTM now and quite liking it.
  • Refactor! Pro and Coderush from Developer Express are still on my list.  There is a new version (3.0.5 at time of writing) out that has some cool new improvements.
  • Aptana Studio.  I heard about this Eclipse-based IDE on the Hanselminutes podcast and had to check it out.  There are some good features in there for CSS and JS.  Worth having around and they cram a lot of IDE into a tiny space!
  • The PowerShell Visual Studio Templates.  Powershell is getting more and more use in my life, and I love the idea of rolling your own cmdlet (pronounced:  "command-let") to manage your own apps.  The page says they are for VS2005 but they are good for VS2008 as well.
  • NMock.  I know there are plenty of mocking frameworks out there each with their own style.  I just happen to like NMock.


What is out?

  • The notable exclusion from my 2008 dev environment is NUnit.  I have been a fan and user of NUnit for some time, but am going with the MSTest-based unit testing framework that is built in to Visual Studio 2008.
  • NAnt is on thin ice in my environment too in favour of MSBuild.  This is largely for pragmatic reasons, there is project information kept in both the VS Solution and in the NAnt file and my preference is to maintain it in one spot only.

And that's it!  I like to keep it light.  For Continuous Integration I am using CruseControl.NET.

I'm still searching for the perfect XPath/XSLT environment.  Visual Studio is OK for the moment, but I have a feeling that the perfect tool may just be Eclipse based :)
Monday, January 14, 2008 10:45:38 PM (AUS Eastern Standard Time, UTC+10:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |